Geek Feminism Wiki
(+Phil Greenspun article as example of benevolent sexism; Unlocking the Clubhouse)
Tag: sourceedit
(→‎Examples: +"women are nicer")
Tag: sourceedit
Line 6: Line 6:
 
* "Women are too smart to work long hours for little reward" [http://philip.greenspun.com/careers/women-in-science]
 
* "Women are too smart to work long hours for little reward" [http://philip.greenspun.com/careers/women-in-science]
 
* "Women are more interested in applications of technology to help people than in theoretical work" (a view expressed in [http://mitpress.mit.edu/books/unlocking-clubhouse ''Unlocking the Clubhouse''] which was later debunked)
 
* "Women are more interested in applications of technology to help people than in theoretical work" (a view expressed in [http://mitpress.mit.edu/books/unlocking-clubhouse ''Unlocking the Clubhouse''] which was later debunked)
  +
* "Women are nicer and more polite than men" (when stated without acknowledgment that women are systematically punished for not being excessively polite and deferential)
   
 
== Research and further reading ==
 
== Research and further reading ==

Revision as of 17:34, 3 March 2015

Benevolent sexism is a variety of sexism that is, on its surface, positive ("benevolent") toward women.

Examples

  • "Women are so good at communication" (Essentialism)
  • "Women are too smart to work long hours for little reward" [1]
  • "Women are more interested in applications of technology to help people than in theoretical work" (a view expressed in Unlocking the Clubhouse which was later debunked)
  • "Women are nicer and more polite than men" (when stated without acknowledgment that women are systematically punished for not being excessively polite and deferential)

Research and further reading