Geek Feminism Wiki
No edit summary
Tag: sourceedit
(Added article to criticisms)
Tags: Visual edit apiedit
Line 12: Line 12:
 
* [http://www.chesnok.com/daily/2011/03/30/where-meritocracy-fails/ Where meritocracy fails] ([[Selena Deckelmann]])
 
* [http://www.chesnok.com/daily/2011/03/30/where-meritocracy-fails/ Where meritocracy fails] ([[Selena Deckelmann]])
 
* [http://www.garann.com/dev/2012/you-keep-using-that-word/ you keep using that word] (Garann Means)
 
* [http://www.garann.com/dev/2012/you-keep-using-that-word/ you keep using that word] (Garann Means)
  +
* [https://modelviewculture.com/pieces/the-dehumanizing-myth-of-the-meritocracy The Dehumanizing Effect of Meritocracy] (Model View Culture - Coraline Ada Ehmke)
   
 
== Research ==
 
== Research ==

Revision as of 14:52, 21 May 2015

Meritocracy is government by those who have "merit", usually described as having the necessary ability or experience to do the job. It is commonly used in FLOSS and other technical communities.

However, meritocracies tend to promote those who not only have the skills/experience, but are also outspoken enough to let everyone know about it. This pushiness/ego/self-aggrandisement is something that women are generally discouraged from doing.

Criticism

A number of geek women have blogged about problems with the concept of meritocracy:

Research

The journal article "The Paradox of Meritocracy in Organizations" empirically confirms the hypothesis that an organizational culture which promotes meritocracy results in greater inequality.

In the Proceedings of the Academy of Management, Gender, Race and Meritocracy in Organizational Careers finds that women and men have different salary outcomes even when they have the same "merit" (based on performance reviews).